Conflict Practitioner

When Racism Shows up in the Mediation Room

I remember a conversation with a mediator who told me, quietly and almost apologetically, that they felt unprepared to manage conversations where racism sat just beneath the surface. They were confident with commercial disputes, workplace clashes, and even heavy family breakdowns. But when an intake form hinted at racial tension, or when a participant made […]

When Racism Shows up in the Mediation Room Read More »

When “Helpful” Framing Does Harm: A Response to the High Conflict Institute on Autism and Conflict

I recently came across a blog post from The High Conflict Institute titled Autism Spectrum Disorder and High Conflict Personalities: Working with Cultural Differences. It is presented as practical guidance for conflict professionals working with autistic parties. It is well-intentioned. It is also, in significant ways, harmful, and the harm is not incidental to the

When “Helpful” Framing Does Harm: A Response to the High Conflict Institute on Autism and Conflict Read More »

Reframing in Mediation: What We Are Really Doing, and Why We Name It

Most mediators are taught how to reframe. Fewer are taught how to explain reframing, and even fewer are encouraged to be transparent about why they do it. Reframing is often described to students as “restating something more neutrally”, “removing toxicity”, or “putting it in a way the other party can hear”. That description is not

Reframing in Mediation: What We Are Really Doing, and Why We Name It Read More »

Should Pregnant Women Be Excluded from Mediation? Questions We Need to Ask

A colleague recently asked me whether I was familiar with any research on the risks associated with mediating with a heavily pregnant woman. The woman in question was in conflict with her ex-partner, the father of her unborn child, and my colleague wanted to know whether there were particular considerations they should be thinking about.

Should Pregnant Women Be Excluded from Mediation? Questions We Need to Ask Read More »

Rejection Sensitivity and Conflict

In my work on neurodiversity and conflict, there are some interesting intersections that come up frequently. There’s one phenomenon I want to make sure you understand, because it comes up constantly in conflict situations. It’s called rejection sensitivity, or sometimes rejection sensitive dysphoria. We all feel rejection Let’s start with what’s universal. We all have

Rejection Sensitivity and Conflict Read More »

Navigating Multi-Party Mediation

If you’re new to mediation, you’ve probably mastered the basics of facilitating dialogue between two parties. But what happens when a third person enters the room? Whether it’s three colleagues in a workplace dispute, a supervisor and two team members, or any other multi-party configuration, these situations require a different approach and careful strategic thinking.

Navigating Multi-Party Mediation Read More »

When Someone Asks You to “Facilitate a Conversation” Rather Than Mediate

You trained as a mediator. You’ve learned about impartiality, confidentiality, and party self-determination. Now a colleague or manager asks if you can “facilitate a difficult conversation” between two people in their team. It sounds like mediation. It feels adjacent to mediation. But before you say yes, it’s worth understanding what you’re actually being asked to

When Someone Asks You to “Facilitate a Conversation” Rather Than Mediate Read More »

Aspirational Ethics: The Character Required for Conflict Work Today

We are living in a moment where the centre of society feels like it’s cracking. Polarisation is no longer abstract, it’s showing up at dinner tables, in workplaces, and in parliament. Social media rewards outrage, making disputes louder and harder to de-escalate. People feel the legal system is inaccessible: too expensive, too slow, too confusing.

Aspirational Ethics: The Character Required for Conflict Work Today Read More »

CRITICAL REFLECTION: Does a Mediation Process Have Integrity?

I was chatting recently with a mediator about a mediation that was mid-way through. A first joint session had taken place, with another scheduled in the near future. However, in the meantime one of the parties had potentially breached confidentiality of the first session. It was unclear whether there was a technical breach or not,

CRITICAL REFLECTION: Does a Mediation Process Have Integrity? Read More »

REAL WORLD INSIGHTS: Why We All Say “Self-Determination” But Practice It Differently

Robert Baruch Bush’s recent article in the Harvard Negotiation Law Review tackles something most mediators have noticed: we all agree that party self-determination is fundamental to mediation, yet we practice it very differently. The Gap Between Theory and Practice Bush identifies two distinct approaches: In facilitative mediation, self-determination matters, but it can be set aside

REAL WORLD INSIGHTS: Why We All Say “Self-Determination” But Practice It Differently Read More »